In-Context Hallucination
Mis à jour le 2025-01-04Confiance : high
in-context-hallucinationhallucination-typescontext-consistencyreading-comprehensionllm-reliabilityfaithfulnesssource-context
A type of LLM hallucination where model output contradicts or is inconsistent with information explicitly provided in the input context, representing a failure in reading comprehension and faithfulness to source material.
Definition
In-context hallucination occurs when language models generate content that:
- Contradicts explicitly provided context information
- Shows inconsistency with source content in the input
- Demonstrates failure in reading comprehension
- Produces outputs that are unfaithful to the given materials
This is distinct from extrinsic-hallucination, where outputs are fabricated and not grounded in world knowledge or training data.
Core Characteristics
According to lilian-weng's taxonomy:
- Context dependence: The evaluation baseline is the provided context, not external knowledge
- Faithfulness requirement: Model outputs should be consistent with source content
- Reading comprehension failure: Represents a fundamental inability to accurately process given information
Evaluation Approach
In-context hallucination is typically easier to evaluate than extrinsic-hallucination because:
- The source material is explicitly provided
- Verification can be done against known context
- No external knowledge retrieval required
- Clear ground truth for comparison
Relationship to Other Concepts
- Complementary to extrinsic-hallucination in the broader hallucination taxonomy
- Critical component of llm-reliability assessment
- Related to factual-accuracy but focused on context consistency
- Important for knowledge-grounding in retrieval-augmented systems
Practical Implications
Understanding in-context hallucination is crucial for:
- Evaluating reading comprehension capabilities
- Developing faithful summarization systems
- Building reliable question-answering applications
- Implementing context-aware generation controls
Detection Methods
Common approaches include:
- Automated consistency checking against provided context
- Human evaluation of faithfulness to source material
- Semantic similarity measurement between output and input
- Contradiction detection using natural language inference